Sunday, March 24, 2013

My Own Crowdsourcing Site



The Beauty of Ag crowdsourcing site came about after a week full of explaining to many people just what agriculture is and why it is important to all of us. These discussions helped me to realize that there are a lot of misconceptions about agriculture and I would like to fix that. However, offhand, people are not interested in agriculture. Therefore, I would like to use art as a medium to connect those that wouldn't necessarily be interested in agriculture with those that have a lot of valid information. Through this site, individuals would be able to submit their own stories and pictures of beautiful agriculture along with any facts and or figures. Others could then click on a picture to learn more about each beautiful thing, while becoming more educated.  

Experiment with Crowdsourcing Take 3


Crowdsourcing take 3

For my final crowdsourcing experiment, I used the young me/now me site.

I first found a picture that was more recent and knew that I must have a similar one from when I was young, so I started looking. Sure enough, there are always pictures with presents!
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I then followed the directions on the site about how to submit them.


And sent them off!


I do like the idea behind this site, but I prefer the Dear Photograph site and I think they are along the same lines. As an audience, the dear photograph site is much more interesting to peruse. This one has its entertaining photos, but not all of them.

Experiment with Crowdsourcing Take 2


Crowdsourcing take 2!

I loved this one, however it didn’t want to behave for me (welcome to technology). So I started on the website:

 
Browsed through a few of the photos and figured out how to do my own.

Went and took my own and then tried to upload it, only to be met with this page:



So, technology:  1, Kelsey: 0, however I still really wanted to do this project, because I love the idea. Therefore, I created a tumbler and tried it again, with still no luck. I also went to their facebook page, the commonly asked questions part, and the news area. Still no luck, although I found this one that is pretty cool:



Annnnnnnyways, this is documentation of my fail at uploading my photo. Here is the picture!


And here is my blurb that should go with it:

Dear Photograph,

The Reno Balloon Races are a huge event held every September. I find it amazing how the park where they are held changes for the day. Between the difference in time (I would never be up and there early enough for sunrise otherwise) and the amount of people there (I run there every week and have never seen that many people there), the park changes dramatically. I believe this photo will have a lot more significance for the subjects in future years since this was taken before they were even dating (which they now are).

Kelsey

However instead of being on the crowdsourcing site, I am leaving it here, to be forever famous in my blog. This is definitely a site I will add to my list of places to check out when I am bored. I also have other ideas about things to submit as well (and hopefully actually submit them).

An Experiment with Crowdsourcing Take 1


Crowdsourcing take 1


Looking at all of the pictures, I thought back on my family and what I grew up with. Therefore I checked the box for extended family and decided to tell my story.




I then typed up my story. Originally, I had trouble deciding what to write about, but after solving that problem, I became excited and started writing away. Yet all too soon I seemed to run out of ideas, plus I started to wonder who would actually want to read it. I also found myself sharing a lot about myself which gets uncomfortable, first because I am not used to do that, or using “I” when I write and also because this is something going on the internet, which is someplace you are not supposed to share your information.
But I chose my pictures:

     

 
 
 
 
 
And entered my story:
The black and white picture is the kind I grew up seeing of my mom and grandmother’s family. With my grandmother coming from a family of eight (who each had at least seven children) and my mom then coming from a family of ten, she never lacked for family. With kids spanning almost twenty years, there are endless stories that I have been told of their one bathroom home and who shared what with who, who got in what car accidents, and who dated who’s best friend. I am sure that at the time, my mom wasn’t too fond of growing up in her family. Being the oldest of four girls, she always had to keep up with the boys and set the standards for the girls, but they all turned out all right. The color picture is what their family could have looked like at a later date, when some of the older kids already had significant others while the babies were barely out of diapers. These are the stories I grew up with and looked forward to, however I didn’t have quite that experience since I was an only child. Instead, I got to hear my mom reminisce and my friends complain and I sat tight with my multitudes of imaginary friends. I do wish that I had siblings, I have always secretly wanted a twin (which obviously isn’t going to happen), however all situations shape who you are, and mine definitely has. I value time with family all the more because I got to be really close with my cousins since they were my pretend siblings. I was able to see more of them as well since I was an only child and able to travel more. I twitch a little at the word spoiled because I always wonder if I was. I hate confrontation because I never had those siblings to fight with. I am really good with people older than me, while I am an introvert that struggles to fit in with people her own age. Overall, I am me and as much as I wish for things that can’t be, I am happy being me and realize I wouldn’t be the same if I had grown up differently, so for now, I am happy listening to all of my mom’s stories and soaking them up.

And then I submitted it

 


Now to wait and see if I become famous in their gallery!

Overall, this was an interesting site, however I truly wonder who reads them. I looked at a few pictures and the ages of the people who submitted stories, however I really didn’t read many of the stories, so who would care about my stories?

Crowdsourcing Questions


According to the article, Crowdsourcing: The art of a crowd, by Carol Strickland, crowdsourcing is “eliminating the boundaries between artist and audience.” On one hand, this makes art more personable and accessible to the common people, but at the same time, do people really want to see some of this random stuff? For example, “take a picture of your parents kissing.” Yet, people are contributing, so clearly people do want to be involved, why do these seemingly random assignments interest others? Why as humans are we interested in seeing pictures/reading stories about some “insignificant” details of others’ lives?

In “Participative Systems” in Rethinking Curating, the author mentions the question of “whether the participants are the audience, and who is watching—ultimately questioning whether this type of art shares an audience with fine art at all.” Which relates back to my other question, before I asked why do we care, but in this case, who is caring? Is it the traditional audience still or is it a new audience? Is there an overlap? Do you have to know anything about art to be part of the audience?

CADRE art show critique

Connections
The human mind works off of connections. Connections between ideas, people, events, and concepts, all of these are what make the human mind function correctly. This is how we learn, tying newly learned ideas to previously learned concepts so that we remember the new information. Therefore, we look for connections in all parts of our life, for instance when we meet someone new, “Oh, do you know so and so?”  This is often a key phrase within the first few encounters with a new person. The same thing happens when entering a new situation, for instance an art exhibit. The mind looks for connections, trying to find the underlying theme of the pieces or how they tie together. Sometimes there is success, and sometimes there is not. For instance, in the case of the Lake Tahoe Community College show “CADRE,” many of the pieces did not seem to tie together, until reading through more information on the exhibit and finding out that the contributors are all alumni of the CADRE laboratory for New Media at San José State University. After discovering this, some of the pieces made a little more sense, however there were still specific pieces that stood out, even before discovering the tie between pieces.
First, Papal Propagation, by Geri Wittig, stood out because of the recent events concerning the pope. Overall, this is interesting because the piece is not new, it is actually from 1994, yet it has new relevance with our recent events. The piece itself is very well made, it looks like a real video game, until you go to play it (especially after being able to play the other games in the gallery), only to find out that it is not interactive. Just as a church should be open to the voices of its people, the video game should be able to be played. However, this game cannot be played, which reflects the Catholic Church and its openness to change and opinions.
On the other hand, we have John Bruneau and James Morgan’s Cooperative Gaming Co-op which are interactive. This is unusual in itself because we have been trained to not touch the art; but this is art that is very much meant to be touched and discovered. While Papal Propagation was very realistic and could be confused with a marketed video game (until the name is read and it is found to be non-interactive), Cooperative Gaming Co-op is less put-together, and does not look like something that could be found in an actual arcade. That being said, the fact that this piece is interactive is a plus. Whether playing the highly inappropriate game where an adolescent is going through puberty or helping to save people from a fire, the user is a part of the art, and therefore able to make his or her own connections. In this way, the art means something to the user, or in other words the viewer.
These two pieces stood out because there was the connection to video games for both of them, and therefore a connection between the two of them; however, another piece that stood out was Siena, by Vera Fainshtein, also because of connections, but in this case, connections to our class. While other pieces were also digital media, this piece tied in with our class and all of the video/animation work we have been doing, which allowed for more appreciation of the piece. There were very simple parts to this piece, namely the background and whole idea, however the shadows made it different and helped it to stand out among the other pieces.
Once again, all of the pieces were interesting, but those that seemed random (for example, were harder to make connections to) were more difficult to understand and therefore did not stand out as much as those that could be tied to previously known information. Yet this is also the whole idea of art, broadening horizons and challenging thinking. Therefore, the next time random art appears, there may be connections to be made with pieces from the “CADRE Show” and then they will not be as random.

Monday, March 11, 2013

Video Reenactment


Here is the original movie that I took sound and ideas from, I use the music from about 2 minutes and 25 seconds in:



And here is my redone version of it.


While there are a few shadows in the portion of the movie that I stole music from, my video represents the whole style of the video as a whole, and less of the specific portion. Throughout the whole movie there are shadows that dance and turn into other things, and that is what I tried to portray through the shadow puppets in the background. I tried to incorporate a little bit of the Dali idea of surrealism as well as the Disney idea of innocence.

Monday, March 4, 2013

Video art chapter questions

News and video art uses the same materials, however to different effects. Oftentimes the same footage can even be used to both effects, what separates them? The article mentions doing it for payment, but both can be. It also mentions the intent, artistic intent or not, but what changes the meaning from art to news? The article states that the two can have overlapping quantities however are not the same thing, do you agree or disagree?

Over and over we have read criticisms about the new forms of art, whether it be photography or something newer like video art. Yet history shows over and over again that art only grows through change. This article itself shows this in a positive light when talking about the Vasulkas and how they played with the "video" medium, however this article does not mention the critiques that probably went along with the changes (that always go along with change). Do you think there is any form of change that would not be critiqued or will it all be critiqued? Why?